2015, a new year for Metro Vancouver: Goal #1 – Web video for ALL Board & Committee meetings – live and archive

Let’s get one thing clear. MetroVanWatch’s first goal, biggest wish and loudest request for 2015 is this: Web video (live and archived) for ALL Board & Committee meetings of Metro Vancouver.

We hope everyone will join the effort to make this happen in the “Greater Vancouver Regional District” (GVRD, known as Metro Vancouver), which consists of 21 municipalities, one Electoral Area and one Treaty First Nation.

Metrovancouver webcast rainbow screen

Under current policy, Metro Vancouver only provides web video of live Board meetings. Not archived. And Committee meetings are all done without web video. Not good enough.

As the Metro Vancouver region settles into the new year of 2015, our populace is in the midst of a race from 2.3 million toward possibly another million people by 2040. On the way, we all hope for peace, prosperity, harmony and sustainability.

To reach those lofty hopes, all players need to be involved.

Municipalities are increasing their communication, coordination, and integration across our region. Municipal governments are in cooperative relationships through Metro Vancouver and other bodies such as the Lower Mainland Local Government Association (LMLGA). We also know that many corporations (developers), investors, businesses and services are key players across all or parts of the region. Metro Vancouver Board

To match these kinds of regional players, there a growing need for communication and collaboration among the citizens, including the civic  persons and groups that are watching their own municipal governments, their city halls and councils.

VIDEO SERVICES AT METRO VANCOUVER ARE CURRENTLY LIMITED

Metro Vancouver currently only provides web video during meetings of the Board of Directors. And once the meeting is over, the video is currently not available to view again. (In fact, the public portion of those meetings often ends in a matter of minutes, and then the meeting goes “in camera,” closed to the public. For greater transparency, the public portion needs to be increased, and in camera portion reduced.)

In addition, NO committee meetings of Metro Vancouver are recorded or broadcast by web video. Not live, not archived. It’s like a black box.

These officials in these meetings are doing public work, making public decisions, using public money. There discussions should be available to the public during and after the meetings.

The problem is certainly not technical, and probably not financial. Metro Vancouver has a good track record of taking video of its conferences and special meetings and most of them are posted online later for anyone to see. And most municipalities that are members of Metro Vancouver already have good web video services for the council and committee meetings. The technology exists. It is being used across the region. Metro Vancouver has no excuse not to provide the same services to the public

We hope that individuals and citizen organizations across the region will strongly demand that their own mayors and councillors call for web video at Metro Vancouver. As soon as possible, during 2015!

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 2015, a new year for Metro Vancouver: Goal #1 – Web video for ALL Board & Committee meetings – live and archive

  1. Pingback: OCP (Unofficial Community Plan) — To quash a lawsuit | Moody Centre Community Association

  2. urbanizta says:

    Reblogged this on CityHallWatch: Tools to engage in Vancouver city decisions and commented:

    Metro Vancouver Board of Directors met today, Feb 13. Important topics were up for discussion. As usual, the meeting quickly went “in camera” (closed to the public) so anyone watching via web video was out of luck. Join the MetroVanWatch campaign to pressure Metro Vancouver (GVRD) to get with it and be more transparent: We want less “in camera” and more web/archive video. Also, Vancouver directors (all 7 from Vision Vancouver) have a bad habit of failing to have their “alternate” attend if they plan to be absent. Today Clr. Jang was absent, so Clr. Carr should have attended. In January, Clr. Stevenson skipped out, so his alternate Clr. Affleck should have attended. We know as a fact that the Vision directors are hoarding critical info and not sharing their power with other elected officials on City Council. Stay tuned for a major CityHallWatch campaign on this topic. Agenda of today’s meeting: http://www.metrovancouver.org/boards/search/Pages/default.aspx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s